MD

I have yesterday's message has been summarized.

MD

It is necessary to rebuild a completely new radar network that has never existed on Earth until now.
We must be able to monitor the entire planet closely and closely.
Objects above 4500 km in altitude must be easily detectable.
Its accuracy must be very precise.
The entire flight trajectory of the ICBM launched by the opponent must be observed in real time and the expected flight path must be accurately calculated.
A friendly ICBM with a warhead other than a nuclear warhead must receive all the data.
Only then can the entire ICBM with the enemy's nuclear warheads be intercepted.

In my opinion, for MD to become reality
It is expected that the development of space objects for military purposes that benchmarked the Hubble Space Telescope will be needed.

We can use it as a radar and collect visualization information.

It is very difficult to use ground radar.
This is because it is possible only by invading enemy territory.
This is due to the principle of radar.

The principle of radar is to detect reflected waves by shooting electromagnetic waves.

The distance to the horizon is shortened to around 80km from the ground.
Even if it is above sea level, the maximum limit is 160 km when the wave is most calm.

In other words, the limit of the detection distance of radar using electromagnetic waves is the horizon.

To detect beyond that, we need to hit electromagnetic waves in the ionosphere of Earth's atmosphere.
In the process of returning electromagnetic waves to the ground, it reaches the target over the horizon to be detected.
The reflected wave hits the ionosphere again and is reflected back to the ground near the friendly radar.

Such a monitoring system is too low in efficiency and accuracy compared to the energy consumed.

The crucial drawback is the inability to detect outside the atmosphere.

It is difficult to change the detection range above the ground on which the radar is installed.

This is because it is difficult to expect the electromagnetic waves to contain accurate information even after passing through the ionosphere.

Satellite communication uses a very special different method for that.

This is because if an electromagnetic wave is just emitted, it cannot pass through the ionosphere, or it is reflected back, and even if it passes, the frequency may change.

The electromagnetic waves used in satellite communication are thus encrypted.

The important thing was to create a radar capable of detecting outside the atmosphere through the ionosphere.

The radar cannot see the enemy's targets over the horizon.

This is the problem with the THAAD system.

It is a system that monitors enemy airspace without detecting outside the atmosphere.
From the enemy's point of view, it is seen as a sign of war.

Ultimately, the purpose of the ground radar system should be limited.

The purpose of detection of missiles passing through friendly airspace in friendly territory must be all.

In that case, ground radar can detect both in and out of the atmosphere.

ICBM is not a cruise missile.
Cruise missiles can be easily intercepted.
So ICBM is in trajectory flight
That’s the hardest way to intercept

ICBMs fired in enemy territory rise vertically at the same time as firing.
It soon breaks through the atmosphere and then slowly begins a trajectory flight.

Eventually, since all actual flights take place outside the atmosphere, all the information needed to intercept must be obtained from outside the atmosphere.

After all, the most critical radar system for ICBM interception is the detection of missiles outside the atmosphere.

Without that information, ICBM cannot be intercepted.

If the ground radar can detect the initial firing ICBM, it will be of great help in getting enough time for intercepting.

However, if we have to invade enemy airspace to get that information, it is a wrong choice.

Because there is no way the other side will not actually prepare for war.

Forgive me if the words are too much

North Korea broke the nuclear proliferation treaty and built a nuclear missile, and we must defend it.

Would that be a reason to invade the airspace of the other country?

Sorry...

But, The following plans can be implemented by using satellites.

First, the satellite visualizes the entire ground of the other country.

Among them, artificial intelligence selectively filters out all information that may be suspected as a sign of missile launch.

To protect personal information, all information up to this point is encrypted.

Finally, only necessary information is determined by humans visually checking

It is assumed that this is the ground monitoring method of the new MD system.

And out of the atmosphere, all the surveillance needed to track missiles with so many satellites in a wide variety of orbits.

(It is also possible to include these functions in military-purpose space objects that benchmarked the Hubble Space Telescope as an example.)

Below is an example.

(It doesn't have to be one)
(It doesn't even have to be that big.)
(Satellites developed for other purposes may include new features.)
(Just secretly modifying the Hubble Space Telescope is perfectly fine)
(If there is a country that has already preoccupied the satellite system with as many orbits as possible, MD will be completed if this is done on all the satellites that are being replaced.)
(The projectiles needed for intercepting were already made a long time ago.)

However, if the goal is only to defend North Korea's nuclear missiles, there may be other plans.

The production line of YAL-1, which is not currently being produced, can be restarted and approximately 40 YAL-1 units of 12 or more units can be placed on the Korean Peninsula.

We can defend all of North Korea's nuclear missiles, except that it fires all the missiles at once.

The other downside is that the number of nuclear missiles in North Korea must be continuously monitored, and the number of aircraft in operation must be continuously increased.

In the end, a real MD system needs to be built, but it is possible without THAAD.

THAAD can detect early, but cannot intercept.

YAL-1's initial detection is less than that of THAAD, but it must intercept.

Please forgive my rudeness before giving the advice below

If THAAD was blindfolded and the MD system that is already being prepared is really complete and it is possible to conquer China and Russia with certainty right now, as long as it is going to war, we can use THAAD.

As far as I know, the way to upset an opponent works only with opponents who are able to destroy it right now.

So sorry...


And monitoring in the atmosphere maintains the existing ladder system.

This is because nuclear warheads can be mounted on all types of missiles.

Ground surveillance radar systems must evolve in the future to increase accuracy and precision.

Longer detection ranges are good, but we have to carefully decide where we are going to run them.

It should only be installed at strategic points where it is absolutely necessary.

If we don't necessarily install it here, we'll get hit.

It is very controversial if it is in front of an enemy territory.

This is because the enemy nation has to face damage for a very long time.

It doesn't matter who started it.
What we need is to be ready to overpower our opponents.

Because the opponent has initiated action, we really need to be prepared to take it down.

We really have to prepare for war.

And preparing for war is better to be secret and sure than to be open.